Find a Lawyer

SAIFUDDIN versus MST. MUBARAK SAWAL

After receiving the majority of the son's section 5 and schedule suit and studying in the fourth year of MB, he claims to be a retired person and relies on the profits earned from the sewing certificate, all of which are earned by him. Was being spent. With regard to her treatment and the purchase of medicine for herself and her ailing wife, Waldetti's son did not say that the father had to bear any extra income so that his son could continue to care for him. There was no claim from the father for any restoration

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• MUHAMMAD HAROON v. State 2009 YLR 1220
• MUHAMMAD HASHIM SEHTO v. State 2009 YLR 1224
• Syed WAJAHAT HUSSAIN ZAIDI v. T.J. IBRAHIM & CO. through Official Assignee 2009 CLD 1225
• MIAN DAD LEGHARI v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1226
• KHALIL AHMAD ALLAHWALA v. Mst. ZAINAB 2009 CLC 1232
• MUHAMMAD IRSHAD v. S.H.O., POLICE STATION, KARACHI 2009 YLR 1232
• SHAUKAT ALI KHAN v. State 2009 YLR 1236
• LIAQAT ALI v. MUHAMMAD NISAR 2009 MLD 1237

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

list of supreme court advocates from Haripur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes