Find a Lawyer

DR. NASAR ULLAH versus ABDUL MAJEED SOOMRO

Section 727272 West Pakistan Civil Servants Pension Rules, 1963, RR 1 1 (II), 4 7, 49 and 4 10 Federal Employees Benevolent Fund and Group Insurance Act (III of 1969), Section 2 (5) Inheritance (Turkey) The legacy of the legacy, the privileged deceased civil servant was negligent and the husband, two brothers and two sisters survived, all with legal help from the gratuity, group insurance, pension, vacation pay and the terminated government employee. Applied for a Certificate of Succession The plaintiff's husband, who was directed to distribute the money according to all the legal heirs and their shares, raised that the deceased had paid only the leave, which could be distributed to all the legal heirs and the rest of the money in it. The definition of was not included. Turkey and therefore, the deceased's siblings did not deserve any share in the siblings. He was removed under the provisions of RR 4 9 & 4 10 of the West Pakistan Civil Servant Pension Rules, 1963, as survivors of the deceased government employee's husband's survivor status as appellant. Because of the pension and the grant, the servant was exclusively entitled to a pension and a grant, while the slaughtered brothers and sisters were not entitled to receive the same amount of financial aid as they would like. Didn't come because it was not a defaulting asset in his lifetime. But it was the government's grant, which was granted on the death of a civil servant, the High Court ruled that the husband of the deceased public servant was entitled to receive gratuity, pension and group insurance, especially the brothers and sisters besides the deceased civil servant. To her husband lawer from fb area from Nankana Sahib lawyer