SHEIKH MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL versus SHEIKH HAFIZ MUHAMMAD ASLAM
Section 4 Stamp Act (II of 1899), Sections 35 and 36 promissory notes are insufficiently sealed nor insufficiently sealed promise note scopes insufficiently sealed with evidence of inappropriate and invalid administration. The promise note was invalid or no false device, but it was only conditional. Disabilities mentioned in section 35 of the Stamp Act, 1881, are not admissible in evidence nor can they be prosecuted unless, once, in the terms of section 36 of the Stamp Act, 1881, The sealed device was inserted into the evidence. And it was marked as exhibit, it was not valid in the first instance of the court, or in the appeal or review of the removal of such device from its consideration, it was necessary in nature and its effect. Article 35. The above act imposes a full ban on the admissibility of a promise note once it has been admitted and exhibited in evidence by any other object of any kind and all such devices. Including those that came under proviso (a) under section 35 of the Steam Act, 1881.
