M/O IPC THROUGH SECRETARY versus ARBAB ALTAF HUSSAIN
Paras 6, 38 and 41, Chairman, Pakistan Cricket Board (Board) With the removal of his position after the approval of the legality of the board and the acceptance of the chairman effect, the theory of the chairman of the board removed from the post. Was dismissed (the board dismissed and formed an interim management committee for the performance of the board officers, under which the High Court rejected the contempt of court act and restored the dismissal board, resulting in the chairman The post was restored - the chairman never personally came forward to remove him and challenge the board's top A. Therefore, for all intents and purposes, he accepted the recommendation and orientation under which a board member challenged the board's superannuation by way of an uncontested decision before the High Court, and the Chairman only applied for the position. In this case, but there was no order of the High Court in relation to his request for transfer, the doctrine of acceptance by silence in such a case also was legal against the Chairman. As can be argued, the Chairman, through his lawyer, promised before the Supreme Court that his confirmation Regarding his position, he requested the court to reinstate him in accordance with the High Court's unwarranted decision, and for a moment he would resign without taking over as chairman. Because of the giving, the chairman accepted the new constitution, and the chairman of the fresh elections (events that took place after the board's supremacy) was a different issue before the Supreme Court.
