Find a Lawyer

SYED HASSAN ASKARI versus BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Article 199 Constitution Request Allotment, Fraudulent and Fraudulent Charge Cancellation Past and closed transaction authorities reopen the case of land allotment in favor of the applicant on the application of fraud and forgery; it was not merely a charge of fraud and fraud. If, in any case, the jurisdictional authorities who would otherwise have been finalized were allowed to take such a course, then there would be no end to the issuance of the memorandum and action by the authorities. The beginning was not without any facts or legal justification and the declaration as such Or has no legal effect was expected to state officials that they will only exercise more caution than before starting proceedings on charges of fraud and forgery cases. Applicability of mind was required before proceeding so as to avoid abuse of law and illicit use of power and to save valuable wasted time processing proceedings \

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. METAL FORMING LTD. 2009 PTD 75
• MCB BANK LTD. through Attorney v. SAAD AKHTAR QURESHI 2009 PLC 75
• MUSHTAQ AHMAD JAVED v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN 2009 PLC(CS) 76
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector Narowal v. SULTAN AHMAD 2009 YLR 77
• JAVED IQBAL v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM 2009 PLD 82
• MADIHA JABEEN v. State 2009 PCrLJ 82
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 2009 YLR 85
• LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director-General v. COMMISSIONER, LAHORE DIVISION, LAHORE 2009 CLC 86

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

online advocate from Sanghi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes