Sections 9, 42 and S4 were for the plaintiff's claim and occupation that he was the owner of the suit land and, since his father's property was not sufficient to house his family, he asked the defendant That his real brother would live in his house and by chance he shifted to another house The plaintiff alleged that the defendant had fraudulently forged a gift certificate in connection with the suit house, While he never gifted or provided possession in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff as the plaintiff stated that the defendant never took any notice from her and the plaintiff had her own children and he was running his business. The plaintiff demanded that the allegedly registered proceedings be illegal and Be deposed and the house occupied. The court ruled in this case, but the appellate court below dismissed the plaintiff's legitimate defense defendant, who asked for a legitimate gift in his favor. In support of the claim that the suit house had legally gifted them by the plaintiff, even the person, who was described as a witness, had clearly stated in court that the plaintiff was ever No gift was given by the brother in favor of his brother. The decision and order passed by the appellate court below were declared separate by the defendant appellate court, while in some cases, material irregularities were exercised in exercising their jurisdiction. Plaintiff's case was restored by the trial court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
