RAJA MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
Section 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition After serving as a Private Secretary in the High Court in 2000 after already being the candidate of Extra Assistant Commissioner for the post of Civil Judge. Applicant's recommendations for their appointment. After qualifying for a written examination and interview, such recommendations were withdrawn by the Public Service Commission from the Public Service Commission alleging that the dates of requests were invalid by the Public Service Commission. Was. At the request of the applicant, the Chief Justice of the High Court had ordered the date of correctness of the date of birth in the petition. The record of the service, which was retained by the High Court on a timely basis, was recorded in the revised Matriculation Certificate's exact date of birth, which was not issued by the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Base. It was fitted for an error by the appropriate field after which the appropriate right had submitted the applicant to his recommendation for such a position, which is unjustified and in addition to Locus Punetti. High Court declares withdrawal from recommendation illegal And directed the Public Service Commission to make recommendations to adjust the application to the competent authority for appointment as a judge. Unlike any publicity advertised in the press, with respect to the elderly, etc., r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
