Section 9 (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), section 540 seeking chemical analyst as a prosecution witness, petition for chemical analyst to be summoned as a prosecution witness at trial, petitioner revised Was The applicant ordered that the applicant allegedly had 20 packets of marijuana seized, while one packet contained one kilogram of opium. And the investigating officer separated 10 grams of 20 packets of opium from opium, and then the cannabis was mixed into a packet of 200 grams and sent to the Chemical Examiner for report, and the Chemical Examiner submitted a positive report. The petitioner was that since the investigating officer had mixed all 20 packets of 10 grams, the chemical analyst had to be summoned as a court witness to face cross-examination by the accused as each free packet of 10 grams. Had to send chemicals to. The applicant's valid proposal for the report for the applicant could not be persuaded as to why the chemical analyst was asked for a cross-examination by the applicant and on what count. And even if the investigating officer allegedly mixed 20 packets of 10 gram samples in a comprehensive packet of 200 grams after taking 10 grams of 20 packets of marijuana weighing 24 kg, the applicant did so. The prejudice was dealt with. And why was the chemical analyst asked that 10 grams of all the packets of recovered marijuana be separated for chemical analysis and the quantity was sent to a chemical analyst by mixing it into a packet of 200 grams? And the report was positive. As one kilogram of opiate, one kilogram is reported
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
