LONE CHINA (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO.7, GUJRANWALA
Section 15 (2) Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1958), Section O8, 10 C&12 (1) (6) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Termination of Services Claims for Outstanding Balance / The employee was terminated for non-payment of salary, salary, guarantees, annual leave, bonuses and overtime payments, an application was made for payment of arrears, which were paid by the Authority. Was accepted. Employers filed constitutional plea, after retaining the authority of the Leader Court of Labor Act, 1936. Applicants' employers believed that the employee was not a regular employee, but was a daily salary and not an invalid order. Osaka, by authority alone, did not have the authority to pass such an order and was told that the order could only be passed through a Labor Court employee who worked with employers for more than 17 years. Employee, both forums had the conclusion that the employee was not employed daily because he had spent more than nine months He worked continuously for a long time and was a permanent employee after the expiration of nine months in terms of clause (b) of paragraph (1). The Industrial and Commercial Employment Standards Ordinance, 1968, contained both orders contained in the Constitution Petition, with no illegal or irregularities, but was supported by record evidence and The correct provisions of the law were applied. Was not open to any exception by the High Court in exercising its constitutional jurisdiction
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
