Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SAGHIR YAHYA versus SIDDIQ


O XXXIX, rr 1 and 2 mergers, interim plaintiffs are applying to interim plaintiffs to prevent defendants from extending and / or stopping any construction on opposing housing plots until the final settlement of homeowner plaintiffs, Where their own houses and disputed plots are located. To be a residential building that cannot be constructed beyond two floors, the defendants accused of seeking authority under the Sindh Building Control Ordinance 1979 to construct the multi-storeyed building as a plot; A huge amount of money has been raised to extend the construction till the question of balance and irreparable injury of the facility has been considered, promising to demolish the additional floors facing the plots if the decree is passed against them. As the risk and the cost of contesting the defendants and in this case

1981 C L C 513

[Karachi]

Before Saeed‑uz‑Zaman Siddiqui, J

DR. MUHAMMAD SAGHIR YAHYA AND ANOTHER‑Plaintiffs

versus

SIDDIQ AND 6 OTHERS‑Defendants

Suit No. 923 of 1980, decided on 14th December 1980.

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑

‑‑ O. XXXIX, rr. 1 & 2‑Injunction, interim‑Plaintiffs applying for interim injunction restraining defendants from raising and/or continuing to raise any construction on plots opposite plaintiffs' house till final‑ disposal of suit‑Plaintiffs alleging area, where their own houses and disputed plots situated to be residential where construction could not be raised beyond two stories‑Defendants alleging to have obtained sanction of authority under Sind Building Control Ordinance, 1979 to construct a multi‑storeyed building as plots in consideration and to,; have invested huge amount in raising construction up to one storey‑ Defendants giving undertaking to demolish excess floors facing plaintiffs plots in case of decree being passed against them‑On consideration of questions of balance of convenience and irreparable injury, held, construction to be solely at risk and cost of contesting defendants and in case of adverse decree being passed such defendants bound to demolish constructions without claiming any compensation pending final disposal of suit not to part with possession or transfer by way of lease or in any other manner any of premises in building and suit to be set down for regular hearing within three months of framing of issues.‑[Injunction].

Yousuf Rafi, G. M. Qureshi, S. Nasiruddin and Mirza Yakoob Be for the Parties.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Deh Pathaan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.