Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

T. R. ARTHUR versus ALEX ROBERT DAVID


Section 47 Section 67 was read with documentary evidence, the respondents only proving the documents by their statement of affidavit and not presenting to their executives to prove them when preparing such documents. And the appellant does not raise any objection at the time of the exhibit; the lower court erred in relying on such documents.
1981 C L C 522

[Karachi]

Before Z. C. Valliani, J

T. R. ARTHUR‑Appellant

versus

ALEX ROBERT DAVID‑Respondent

Second Appeal No. 198 of 1976, decided on 14th December 1980.

(a) Evidence Act (I of 1872)---

S. 47 read with S. 67‑Documents‑Proof‑Respondent proving documents only through his deposition on oath and not producing their executants to prove them‑‑Appellant raising no objection at time of production and exhibition of such document‑Held, lower Court erred in relying on such documents.

Muhammad Yuruf v. S. M. Ayab P L D 1973 S C 160 rel.

(b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 19o8)‑

S. 11‑Res judicata‑Former suit dismissed for non‑prosecution and not on merits‑Former decision, held, did not constitute res judicata. [Res judicata].

(c) Evidence Act (I of 1872)‑

S. 92‑‑Oral evidence, exclusion of‑Respondent by oral evidence not trying at all to show any variation in terms and conditions of lease agreements‑Such oral evidence, held, admissible.‑[Evidence].

Riaz Ali v. Shabbir Ahmad Khan 1971 S C M R 598 distinguished.

Firm Kesla Mal Nand Kishore v, Cooper Allen & Co. A I R 1936 All. 717 ; Kunja Bahari Das v. Raman Behari Das A I R 1937 Cal. 619; Champaran Jain v. Sripati Nath Das A I R 1938 Cal. 430 and Athar Ali v. Abdul Taher Bhuiyan P L D 1961 Dacca 349 rel.

Sami Ahmed for Appellant.

A. F. Af. Mokarim for Respondent.

Dates of hearing : 26th and 27th November 1980.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Kamalia Musa lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.