Find a Lawyer

AUTOCRAFT THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

Article 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Assessment of the Customs Value of Goods Appraisal Such evaluation cannot deprive the department nor tax proceedings for any of the aspirants to adopt higher value. I was not available, especially when the importer made the provisional payment under protest to release his goods as provisional settlement subject to the final decision.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• AMAN ULLAH RANJHA v. SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-CORRUPTION, SARGODHA 2009 PCrLJ 235
• MUHAMMAD HABIB v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/JUSTICE OF PEACE JAMPUR, DISTRICT RAJANPUR 2009 PLD 235
• Malik MUZAHIR HUSSAIN v. TESNEEM AHSAN 2009 MLD 239
• Ch. MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE, ADVOCATE v. CANTONMENT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHUNIAN, DISTRICT KASUR 2009 PLD 240
• Malik ZULFIQAR v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Communication Islamabad 2009 MLD 244
• PUNJAB ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ORGANIZATION (REGISTERED) through Vice-President v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Irrigation and Power, Lahore 2009 PLD 245
• ZIBTEC (PVT.) LTD through Director v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTOR 2009 PTD 246
• MANZAR LATIF MIAN v. Ms. MASARRAT MISBAH 2009 CLD 247

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

immigration advocates from Gambet lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes