Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus MST. SHAFIQUE FATIMA

Section 42 and Permanent Court of Permanent Order of Trial of 42 and Permanent 54 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff that it was permissible to include a legacy change before the agreement was filed on 15 8 2003 2003 2003 on Was confirmed and confirmed on 18 18. 8 2003, a copy of the journal was kept on record. The agreement, which was dated 6 8 2003, mentioned the mutation's entry, which was dated 15 8 2003, in which the High Court accepted the petition and described itself, giving the parties an opportunity to look into this aspect of the case. The case was remanded to the trial court for consideration. Leading evidence at the point

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• REHANA YASMIN v. ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY through Vice-Chancellor 2009 MLD 278
• SARFRAZ v. State 2009 YLR 279
• Mian MUHAMMAD LATEEF v. Mst. NASIMA WARSI 2009 CLC 279
• SUNNY TRADERS through Proprietor v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division (FBR), Islamabad 2009 PTD 281
• MUHAMMAD AKHTAR v. State 2009 PCrLJ 284
• NADEEM-UD-DIN MALIK v. FAROOQ BUTT 2009 MLD 286
• FESCO (WAPDA) v. ARSHAD MAHMOOD MIR 2009 PLC 288
• AMJAD IQBAL v. Haji SABIR HUSSAIN 2009 CLC 289

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

best advocate from Hattian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes