Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OI, R 10 & O XXI, R 36 Application for specific performance to be applied to the respondents / tenants in the case which was accepted by the parties required in the case , The court demanded that he was a tenant. Real estate was neither necessary nor appropriate to the party for the specific performance of the contract. The legality court held the jurisdiction to the maximum and committed economic mismanagement, even in the case of the decree of ownership through the specific performance of the contract, the tenant was required to act immediately. The premises could not be disposed of and the tenant's rights were protected under O XXI, R 36, CPC and he would become the tenant of the person in whose favor the decree was approved and the owner of the same tenant. Will be. Partly by himself and partly by the person to whom he is nicknamed, the result will be to the extent that he has taken it on his own, he will not be ousted by the NT. Could not be physically evicted because according to the terms of his tenancy he had the right to continue to occupy it as a tenant, but the borrower got what is called property ownership and Constitutional possession is allowed under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
