Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus MST. SABIHA IQBAL

In Plaintiff's request for a declaration as the plaintiff's ex-wife of the plaintiff, he purchased the suit plot and built a house on his behalf, which was later found to be an empty stamp on the plaintiff's claim after the fraud. Got his signature / thumb impression on it and moved on to his name. It was the lawyer's choice to repay the loan; and he later found out that the defendant had prepared the gift work on his behalf on such stamp paper and filed it in the office of the plaintiff-proof plaintiff and his witnesses. Supported the case, the plaintiff presented in the receipt of proof of sale of her jewelry, receipts were issued and the plaintiff was in possession of the suit house through utility bills because the plaintiff was in possession of it. The suit did not bring him a lawsuit to declare the suit house illegal because the beneficiary of the gift tax would prove his valid execution. That the plaintiff had failed to do any investigative witnesses in the presence of which the plaintiff had gifted the gift according to which there was no ordinary witness suit.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• MUNIR ALAM v. CIVIL JUDGE/FAMILY COURT, LAHORE 2009 CLC 442
• DAWOOD v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, D.G. KHAN 2009 MLD 444
• AKHTAR HUSSAIN alias KAKA v. State 2009 PCrLJ 444
• ABID SHAH v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE SHEIKHUPURA 2009 PLD 444
• IMRAN MAQBOOL v. State 2009 YLR 450
• HABIB BANK LTD. v. VIRK HOUSE TRADING COMPANY LTD. 2009 CLD 451
• Mian MUHAMMAD WAHEED AKHTAR v. SPECIAL JUDGE (OFFENCES IN BANKS), LAHORE 2009 MLD 457
• AZMATULLAH v. State 2009 YLR 458

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

how to become a advocate from Kandhkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes