HABIB BANK LTD. versus VIRK HOUSE TRADING COMPANY LTD.
Under sections 14 and 13 of the foreign judgment, it is considered for the first time a three-judge bench of a foreign court, headed by the President of the Commercial General Scope Court, examining documents, applications and others. Regarding the relevant record, the defendants' arrests came into operation. The court responsible for payment of suit money had considered the application for opening the relevant account, receipt of loan deposit and copy of the relevant statement of account and then fixed the responsibility of the defendant's decision for all intents and purposes. Yes, it was his decision to merit responsibility. A direct decision was made on the defendants. The appellate court held that the accused was liable to pay only the amount of the suit, certified copies of foreign judgments and their translations were available on record, it was deemed to have been granted to the court by section 14, CPC and the defendant. The jurisdiction under consideration will be heard by the court of competent jurisdiction. Failing to reject the aforementioned view that nothing was available on record to show that the plaintiff sued, applied under section 13, the CPC's decision was final. And in Pakistan, the defendants and the High Court were bound, while enjoying the claim on the basis of a foreign judgment, could not sit on the appeal of the facts and conclusions filed by the foreign court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
