The accusation against the accused in the testimony of section 295c evidence was that while he was sitting at a tea stall with about twelve people, a man who was presented as a witness said, `Salam offered and In response, the accused made derogatory comments and allegedly abused her. Another person who allegedly offered Salam to the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and another who allegedly listened to it said that the Remarks Prosecution, who was a star witness in the case, received him when he testified in court. He, unanimously, said that the person who unanimously dismissed them had no relation with the accused and the accused, instead of responding to the greeting, used abusive language against the said person. And did not give any derogatory remarks against Hazrat Muhammad (pbuh) and other witnesses of the prosecution who The witnesses of the occasion were not able to be trusted, even otherwise the most interested witness because he was not on good terms as the accused when he allegedly treated the son in a dishonest way. Was tried, so to avenge him he was trying to falsely accuse the accused of being a mere Muslim prosecution story while not being punished. Was also suspected. Or the conviction cannot be maintained on easy speculation and assumption, nor was the prosecutor required to prove his case until his conviction for the death sentence; Was missing Trial
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
