Find a Lawyer

TASSADUQ HUSSAIN versus MST. MUNEER FATIMA

Section 17 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Declining the relationship of the landlord and tenant to the landlord and tenant because he purchased the property through a controversial cover sale agreement and the tenant exhibited by the tenant. It did not mention in terms of the validity of the sale agreement that it was seized upon payment of the sale of the sale. The tenant in his written statement did not specifically request the date and time when he was occupied in the dispute, nor did he request the manner in which he sought Payment was made on the sale issue, the applicant also did not file a specific performance claim. The sale agreement against the landlord that was to fulfill its title was still in the name of the Th. The Cantonment Board had a relationship between the landlord and the tenant on the land under the tenant sale agreement. Failed to prove the facts of the occupation as the landlord owner under which the application for leave of appeal was dismissed.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• Sheikh SALEEM v. Mrs. SHAMIM ATTAULLAH KHAN 2014 SCMR 1694
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. State 2014 SCMR 1698
• Dr. MUHAMMAD ASLAM BALOCH v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary, Health Department 2014 SCMR 1723
• SAJJAD HUSSAIN MUKHI v. State 2014 SCMR 1741
• SARWAR AND IFTIKHAR AHMED v. The STATE 2014 SCMR 1762
• AZIZ-UR-REHMAN v. Haji AURANGZEB 2014 SCMR 1819
• Haji ABDUL RAZIQ KHAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary M/O Commerce and Textile Industry, Islamabad 2014 SCMR 1821
• NAZIR-UL-HASAN v. Syed ANWAR IQBAL 2014 SCMR 1827

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

divorce advocates from Pirpai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes