Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 392/411 bail, grant of further investigation was not designated in the FIR and had no role as the mere identification was not paraded. Was. Exactly nothing is known about the identity of the accused, which could potentially link the accused to the commission of the crime; no direct or indirect evidence against the accused was available after 1/2 year. The supplementary statement was not designated, only after a long period of fact was proved, the complainant could not identify the real culprits, no weapon of crime was recovered from the accused, the amount recovered from the accused was only 10 Thousands were in the range, while the robber had to pay a fine of Rs 19, 38,107 and there was no evidence on record whether the incident involved That was exactly what was looted was recovered from the suspect's trial Aid, conditions, had already become investigation of the offense, the accused was admitted to bail conditions
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
