Article 5, Schedule and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The Family Court on the processing of a constitutional petition for the recovery of articles has been filed by the plaintiff against the recovery of the articles filed by the plaintiff and against the decision of the Family Court. Upon filing an application by the Appeal Order filed by the appellate court, the appellate court also dismissed the proceedings against the verdict of the verdict, however, the appellant court's plaintiff / decision defendant filed the constitutional petition with the appellate court. Filed against improper order approved by. The Family Court was retained, 10 months after the unlawful injunction, though no specific time was provided for filing a constitutional petition. But the reason was that no illegal movement, misrepresentation or decree of the courts could be read underneath it, but the contradictions indicated by the defendant were not much help for this simple reason. Could do. In the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court could not be changed simply because the inquiry could not be altered by the lower courts because the defendant's conduct in reading the evidence was not commendable which also prevented it, otherwise discriminating for equitable relief and The orders, which were not only harmonious in nature, were well and perfectly maintained in accordance with the law on the subject.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
