ALLY BROTHERS AND COMPANY (PAK) LTD. versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CABINET SECRETARY
Arts 133 and 134 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VII, R 2 Suit for recovery of money after closing the evidence of the defendant while the evidence of the defendant was in progress and the statement of a witness was in progress. Recorded, an objection was raised by the plaintiff in cross-examination regarding the nature of his appointment and further examination of the witness was withheld and he was instructed to submit his appointment order when the witness was accompanied by the document. If present, the postponement date of the hearing was raised by the plaintiff's counsel asking that the first documents be presented with evidence and then that the witness be in a position to examine the trial court, however, an unknown order Investigating the rights of the claimant detained under "Illegal Immediate", which violated the most valuable right of the court staff and The verdict was imposed on him. Such an order could not be sustained, the anonymous order was set aside, the NT, which was required to be presented by the said witness, would first be taken into evidence and then the plaintiff would also be examined. The witness will be allowed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009