Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for restitution allowance was granted by the Family Court Appellate Court, with the consent of the parties, decided the decision and decision passed by the Family Court. The petition filed in which he sought to produce additional documentary evidence, the defendant was also allowed in his decision to remand the decision to the Family Court to this extent, post-remand. In the proceedings, the Family Court allowed the defendants to amend their writings. No additional case was made with the consent of the statement and the advice of the parties, and the Family Court decided the case on the basis of the evidence already entered and the case filed by the plaintiff under unknown judgment and order was dismissed. The defendant filed a lawsuit against. An appeal was filed before the appellate court, but the defendant filed an amended constitutional petition nearly nine months after the family court dealt with all the issues for authentic reasons. The counsel's counsel's counsel's emphasis was on the point that the family court failed to present an additional case in compliance with the approved remand order after the remand. Neither party was prejudiced by the appellate court's endorsement of any additional matter, as the whole dispute revolves around matters already approved by the Supreme Court's decision. During the meeting, all important points were shared. The matter was not resolved with the consent of the parties;
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
