Find a Lawyer

GHULAM QADIR versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER

Due to the Section 10 and 11 land allotment, the claimant's claim was terminated and due to the claimant's demise, the plaintiff had also declared the allotment of land in favor of the deceased claimant. Fake and for that reason, even the party responsible for the cancellation, which was not informed, could not verify the invalid allotment of land. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1008
• MUHAMMAD NAZIR v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MIANWALI 2009 CLC 1010
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1011
• AMER KHAN v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT 2009 MLD 1011
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Collector v. MUHAMMAD BASHIR AHMAD 2009 YLR 1012
• EJAZ v. State 2009 YLR 1015
• MUHAMMAD AZAM v. State 2009 YLR 1018
• DILBAR HAYAT v. R.F.O. MULTAN RANGE, MULTAN 2009 MLD 1020

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Chowk Munda lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes