Pre-arrest, FIR certification could not be ascertained when and where the accused was presented with the risk of age, Section 498 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Rule 420/406/506. Threats were made against him and common allegations were made. The accused, which can only be interpreted as his personal, no crime, whatever it was, was initially made against the accused, even if the allegations in the FIR were purely newsworthy. Was accepted and accepted as fact. Even when the defendant violated the terms of the lease purchase agreement under which he purchased the vehicle from the complainant, it was still legal for the complainant to request criminal law with the active support of the local police And the facts were not justified. The only remedy available to the complainant was the purely domestic dispute that had to be referred to a civil court for the specific performance of a lease purchase agreement or alternative to a recovery. The police cannot be one of the outstanding liabilities, nor should it be allowed to assume the role of a civil court, in which case the duties of the civil court were found to have been violated and the registration and investigation of the accused against the accused was found to be liable. The arrest was indicated by interim arrest. The previous bail bond was already guaranteed by the accused, in the circumstances. r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
