Section 5, Schedule, Section 13 and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Implementation of Suit Decree for Recovery of Restoration Allowance Increase in maintenance allowance The family court ordered the suit for rehabilitation to be given Rs 500 per month. Because the appeal was upheld. The execution petition was filed by the appellate court during the stand of the execution petition. Plaintiff moved a request for a restitution allowance. The appeal filed by the defendant against which application was allowed and a monthly rehabilitation allowance of Rs 500 was increased with a 10 annual annual increase every three years, adding that the family court's decision was an irrelevant decision and this order. It was necessary and appropriate for Plaintiffs / Plaintiffs to establish a separate case for transfer of an independent application or to increase restitution allowance. It was necessary for the plaintiff / decree holder to grant a restitution allowance. The petition was filed and so was the Petition of Appeal Court independently of the execution petition Someone had failed to understand the application and there is no doubt that the judge was pursuing the process executed at the request of the family, which was sent to the Court, may be allowed to increase in maintenance allowance based on the circumstances change. And with the circumstances, the residential family court price, while the rehabilitation allowance was increased from Rs 500 to Rs 1200, while allowing the constitutional application, the High Court, in keeping with the appellate court's decision and decree, set aside the family court's order. Retained judgment.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
