Section 497 (2) Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 496 and 380 bail, further investigative grants were designated in the FIR and serious allegations were made regarding the abduction of the complainant's daughter, however, Records and evidence indicate that the offenders charged with the trial were attracted in this case, the abductor in his statement before the magistrate under Section 164, CR PC It was said that no one had abducted her and she had contracted the marriage. With his free will and consent, the kidnapper, in his statement to the Investigation Officer under Section 161, CRPC, also stated that his earlier statement was rigorous and under pressure and that the accused It was alleged that the person who kidnapped her and subsequently committed adultery with her. At the same time, when two contradictory statements were available on the record, the kidnapper's statement could not be relied upon and in fact was not known. Which statement about the statement was supposed to be made by one of the prosecution witnesses who also stated very clearly that he had not seen the incident and that by the complainant in the FIR The name was added which did not affect recovery. The accused and the offenses under which the accused was liable to prosecute did not come under the prohibited clause of section 497; CCPC accused the accused of further investigation of his crime, he entered bail, Under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
