ABDUL MAJEED versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, TALAGANG
Sections 12 and 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional petition cover the minor plea filed by the applicant for the custody of his minor son at the age of 11, the Guardian Judge in favor of the petitioner, which According to the mother's instruction, such order was made by the appellate court to hand over the minor boy's custody to the applicant. Despite the personal law of the minor, the main consideration was always the welfare of the minor, Not only was the monetary too emotional and the emotional well-being of the minor was more important than the economic aspect. Because, regardless of who has the authority of a minor, the father, as a natural and legal guardian, entrusts the responsibility of caring for his minor children as it is his duty to perform, Could not be misled under In any case the needs and desires of a minor have to be taken care of, while a minor has to discredit the irresponsible and emotionally weak, he does not become a stable person. And he cannot suffer from it. The assets of the world at large and the society to which the petitioner was particularly concerned were based on the appellate court's decision and the decision on which the appellate court relied on the judgment of the minor who lived in the minor years. What was a minor and was too young to form his own opinion that in his welfare where constant supervision was required for an eleven-year-old boy, he was not given by his father who had to go out and earn a living. , Regardless of whether he was living in Pakistan
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
