Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 489F guarantee, the complainant was terminated by the contractor after spending Rs 42,00,000 upon completion of the project, but dispute arising on payment But a settlement of the money was found between them, after which the accused gave the complainant a check of Rs. 42,00,000, Rs., 000, which the bank was dishonored for withholding payment. Investigating the accused, following the execution and issuance of the said agreement, make a defense sufficient by the complainant to avoid the outcome of the registration of the case under Section 489F, PPC. I have been very active and the accused has adopted various versions and steps to improve his defense. To put it under pressure, the complainant was sued by the accused against the complainant for involvement in a case, which was found to be false and was canceled after an investigation on the basis of it. After keeping the distorted facts out of the fact, the accused subsequently filed a private complaint against the complainant and others as well. It appears that all these acts were done by the accused only and with irrational motives and only the complainant session. In order to avoid the payment of Rs 42,00,000, the court, while granting bail to the accused, ignored the complainant's position in a very unusual way, so there was no reason to dismiss it. , Its order, in each case, was to allow an accused to defame and irrationally bail. The section 497 (1) clause, CCP was not a principle of universal application and dealt with each case on its own facts and circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
