Sections 498 and 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), before Section 496B, further inquiry case was confirmed by two accused. The complainant of the FIR claimed that the accused had kidnapped a married woman who had already been reconciled to another man, saying that the other person had been abducted by his wife / alleged abductor. The relevant FIR did not choose to file which the accused had relied on. It was marked and signed by the alleged kidnapper, and at one point he claimed that he had not signed the signature or thumbprint of the alleged abductor. He has said that he has been accused of being forced to sign some documents. , CCP, but after joining his parents, he claimed that the statement obtained by the accused under pressure was allegedly disclosed by T such disclosure that the magistrate made relevant provisions of the law. It was recorded after being attached to a court proceeding after compliance, on at least two occasions, he had made his marriage property before the High Court as well as the Magistrate and had filed it in the Family Court. Before the wedding was claimed to be about realism, or the alleged kidnapper complained by Nehamana. Was in custody, the physical custody of the accused did not have to affect the recovery of the allegation through inquiry. Further inquiry is also needed in connection with the theft of gold jewelery and net cash, Section 497 (2), further inquiry into the scope of CR PC's favor in the case of the accused.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
