Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus SHAZIA KAUSAR

Article Pakistan Constitution Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application restitution, the past and future spouse were forced to leave abroad and after that the husband did not take any effort to rehabilitate her with the minors. The wife did not refuse to have a marital share with the husband. The lower appellate court rightly ruled that the wife was entitled to the previous care that the father was the natural caretaker of the minor and that he wanted the minor to be neglected. Where he lived, all the rules of law were obliged to restore him. The man can easily pay restitution allowance of Rs 5,000 per month to the minor and the minor, the High Court refused to interfere with the finding of the facts filed by the lower appellate court petition.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• ZAMIR AHMAD KHAN v. Dr. SALEEM HAMEED MALIK 2009 CLC 726
• AKHTAR IQBAL v. MEMBER (JUDICIAL-III) BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB 2009 MLD 729
• ASIF KHAN v. State 2009 PCrLJ 729
• MUHAMMAD KHAWAR BASHIR v. State 2009 PCrLJ 736
• NAYYAR AHMED MALIK v. SUB-REGISTRAR (GULBERG), LAHORE 2009 CLC 737
• Dr. MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM v. SECRETARY HEALTH 2009 PLC(CS) 741
• IMPERIAL BUILDERS through Manager v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Legal Government 2009 PTD 744
• NADEEM alias PUPU v. State 2009 PCrLJ 744

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

advocate for immigration from Killa Abdullah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes