Find a Lawyer

M.D. PASSCO versus M. ZUBAIR

In the Section 2A Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), a single judge of the High Court of Appeal for the Section 3 intra-court directed the employer to remand the employee to the Supreme Court in the Salaam and Federation of Pakistan. Restore on the basis of judgment. The effect of PLD 2006 SC 602 for corporation's appeal to the Supreme Court against the decision of the service tribunal by the corporation was abolished and the decision to reinstate the service tribunal employee was reached and implemented. The final directive given by a single judge who was responsible for the import was not consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion in the case of Mohammad Idrees vs. Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan PLD 2007 SC 681, but the present The employee himself referred to the Labor Court for redress. He complained to the High Court bench of the High Court, so, in addition to observing, he avoided any further elaboration on the subject. The Hat Labor Court will strictly proceed in this matter in accordance with the law expressed in any judge's decision in any observation or opinion and will promptly adjudicate the pending employee's request before him \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• IMPERIAL BUILDERS through Manager v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Legal Government 2009 PTD 744
• NADEEM alias PUPU v. State 2009 PCrLJ 744
• MUHAMMAD ASGHAR v. State 2009 MLD 745
• MUHAMMAD IRSHAD v. SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, LAHORE 2009 PLC(CS) 747
• DAEWOO PAKISTAN MOTORWAY SERVICE LTD. through Chief Executive v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM 2009 MLD 750
• NAZIMA SHAHZADI v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION PINDI GHEE DISTRICT ATTOCK 2009 PCrLJ 751
• BUSHRA IMRAN v. WAPDA 2009 PLC(CS) 752
• AHMAD KHAN v. KAUSAR PERVEEN 2009 CLC 759

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

top advocates from Bagh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes