IFFAT BIBI versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
R7 (e) Law in evidence (Article 10 (1984)), Article 87 (2) (3) Admissibility in proof of sanitary photocopy of a document in the Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), section 42 (12). Scope Petitioner was enraged by the seniority assigned to his juniors, Petitioner filed an appeal without a certificate / certiorari in his service tribunal, which was served with a government-issued memorandum. The appeal of the memorandum in the Tribunal was affirmed by the Advocate General, but the original document bearing Rule 7 (e) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal (Code of Conduct) Rules 1976 The officer who will be a copy of the order with an appeal to show that this memorandum. Not acceptable unless the officer in custody of the original documents should be certified to be copied in the same manner in the presence of clear legal provisions No further interpretation under Article 8787 was permissible. A public official who has the custody of a public document may also give a person, upon request of payment of a legal fee, a certificate written in the scope of such copy, which is an exact copy of such document or section. His and such certificate shall be listed and purchased by such officer with his name and official title and stamped on the Government-issued sanitary list with the appeal to the service tribunal. And was not a genuine copy certified by the Advocate General under Article cer87. (2) and did not meet the requirement of R7 (e) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal (Code of Conduct) 1976,
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2014
