Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Rule 302/34/109, the cancellation of the prisoner's role was attributed to the accused through the subpoena of two of the prosecution's witnesses, which shows that Since the accused's liar was involved, the matter could not be ruled out and no motive was assigned to the accused for any crime and it would seem that he would have extended his entire family to expand the network in this case. The persons involved in the malala and malicious complaint have been charged. Therefore, it cannot be ignored that when the accused's bail was required by a competent court on very strong and extraordinary grounds, they should revoke it, which was not presented by the complainant, the Sessions Court. There was an order granting a pre-arrest bail to the accused who was cleared. Not pleading or arbitrarily the petition was rejected in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
