Plaintiff alleges that the PTD filed for Section 8 and 42 Cooperative Society Act (VII of 1925), Section 70 and 70A Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVII of 1958), Section 10 suit declaration and occupation. Fake and fabricated in the Cooperative Housing Society in favor of the defendant on the suit plot; that he was allotted the date 184 1943, as a member of the society, on the payment of the suit. Was placed nearby. After independence, such a society was declared vacant by the custodian of Equity Properties and such a society was re-registered in the year 1962. And such a society identified the suit plot on 23 5 1962, after which it transferred the suit plot dated 21 10 1962 from the Department of Settlement ment under the PTD and claimed the temporary member of the Society Validity after independence. What, such a society identified this suit plot. The custodian member of this society needed to have at least a full payment portion or a building plot in order to become a member of his vacancy, the plaintiff owned it in the society and the suit plot which he owned. Lasts for years. , 1986, when defendant was temporarily admitted as a member on the basis of such PTD suit plot, he was never treated as an empty plaintiff because of his The transfer from the society was not disputed at the payment of the full price, the defendant having excluded the plaintiff from the suit plot. 22 1 1987 In the first written statement it was claimed that the suit plot was considered eviction and the plaintiff could not avail. Second Writing b
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
