Section 2 (b (b) / evidence 34) Definition of evidence occurred at the home of the complainant and the defendant; at the relevant time, the presence of the complainant was natural. By the complainant, legally by another independent witness. It was confirmed that he had nothing to do with the deceased, and his presence was also natural in the presence of a partner, and a resident of the same area according to the FIR said that the two victims were saved. Was immediately transferred to the hospital, on which the suspect was immediately named, according to a forensic laboratory stimulus report. The medical evidence of the fireworks injury was recovered to both the defendants on the plea of the accused, as Kalashnikov was found to be the accused, as the prosecution did not deny. He was closely related, but admitted that he had cleanliness. He did not join the police investigation, nor did he make any request to any officer about the alleged involvement of the accused and he double-killed the accused. Attempted unsuccessfully to escape liability. Without any doubt, the accused was responsible for the brutal double murder of two innocent people in two highly contentious cases, and he did not deserve any relaxation and the conviction was upheld.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
