Section 497 (2) Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 bail, grant of further investigation In this case a second FIR with the police officer already under investigation was allegedly produced. There was no legal restriction on the investigation of an identifiable offense for the complainant police officer. However, the complainant police officer will always be interested in presenting the report under section 17373, the purpose of the investigation against the accused under CRPC will, in the circumstances, fail, where the complainant police officer has also informed the investigator. Were wearing the case. The requirement of fair play would be that where a police officer at the same police station was the complainant, the investigation should be made by another police officer, who is senior in the upgrades; otherwise, it would always be a law-abiding police officer. Makes fun of There was an incident of self-investigation and his three subordinates were witnesses to the restoration. There was no evidence in the police record if the police party ever tried to call another person to join the recovery process. Then it was not the prosecution's case that someone was. Called upon, but he avoided joining the retaliation proceedings for the defendants' retaliation or for any other reason. The fraudulent actions taken by the police, under the circumstances, required double scrutiny. During the trial, which was not possible, the accused was admitted to bail, under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
