Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/148/149 guarantee, the grant of further investigative charges against the accused in the FIR, that it has begun unarmed firing and no one The injury did not, by itself, have been sufficient to prosecute the accused for further investigation within the meaning of section 497 (2); in addition to the CCP, the accused has been jailed for the past one year and four months. Was behind bars and the trial had not yet begun. In the circumstances, the bail is admitted

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• FOUZIA BEGUM v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN Through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad 2009 CLD 1537
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2009 PTD 1541
• MUHAMMAD AZMAT v. State 2009 YLR 1557
• RUPAFIL LTD. v. TAXATION OFFICER/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LAHORE 2009 PTD 1557
• SHABEER HUSSAIN v. State 2009 YLR 1573
• MUHAMMAD IMRAN v. IFTIKHAR AHMAD 2009 YLR 1588
• ABDUL GHAFOOR v. Mst. RASOOLAN BIBI 2009 YLR 1593
• MUHAMMAD KALEEMULLAH v. State 2009 YLR 1598

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

property advocate from Tando Jam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes