Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 381/411 Guarantee, Grant of Further Investigation Grant, no doubt, was designated in the FIR with specific character, but the High Court facts and circumstances. According to the provisional assessment had to be made whether the accused was involved in the case or not, the charge against the accused was related to theft of Rs 500,000, which did not appeal to anyone. The accused was staying in the same house with the stolen money which was incomprehensible. Because he could easily hide out of the house after stealing the money, the accused could not find any reason to stay in the house after stealing a large sum of money, according to an FIR story The part feels like an outrage and a false implication of the accused. The case ruled could not be ruled out. No direct or indirect evidence was available on record against the accused, except for the complainant's two servants, who, at the instance of the complainant, included evidence against the accused. Because they were under the influence. There was no effect of recovery from the complainant by the police, no memorandum of recovery was reportedly prepared, though no source of theft was disclosed in the FIR, in case of further investigation of the accused. I, it was acknowledged on bail, circumstance r. n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
