Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 436, 427, 354, 148 and 149, Grant of further investigation In the first embarrassment, the crime in question was found to be very abusive, but upon closer scrutiny. In the records, including police records, it appears that the damage caused by the fire was not of the same magnitude as the complainant claimed that no domestic articles or clothing were burned in the incident, but the dust / Thatched cottage had some building materials burned. There was a serious dispute between the parties regarding the ownership and occupation of the land since the dispute involved complex matters relating to the ownership and occupation of the parties so the court refuses to return any search on this behalf. Should that be the case for any party, pending the civil and customs proceedings before the courts, the central charge was laid against the accused's son, who according to the complainant torched the torch / torch. At the time, many people had gathered at the scene of the incident, it could not be established that the suspect's smoke was further increased. Who set the case on fire, he was entitled to bail as a matter of fact. The investigation has already been completed, the detainees will not serve the purpose of the accused, and any accused, under the circumstances, was granted bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
