Appeal contradicts ocular testimony against medical evidence relating to section 302/148/149/109 criminal code of conduct (V9 1898), section 417 (2A), which the complainant did not disclose in the FIR But on the same day in his supplementary statement, he designated all those accused of assigning a specific role to him, in cases of properly observed crime, the prosecutor generally did not rely on evidence of the circumstances. But in the present case, the prosecution sought to be aware of the inherent weaknesses, the extra-judicial confession, and the testimony of the accused, which was given by the trial court. Yat was rejected for good and concrete reasons; the decision was not based on arbitrary, unrealistic, artificial or perverse reasoning, nor was it relaxed to read false news or read evidence. In view of the irregularities in the procedure adopted by the trial court, illegality was also identified in the circumstances of the appeal against the defendant's verdict.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
