Find a Lawyer

ZIBTEC (PVT.) LTD THROUGH DIRECTOR versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTOR

The scope order section 195 passed by the Principal Operator (Customs) may be submitted by the Powers or the Collector only to Customs while the Customs Act, 1969 Collector using the jurisdiction under 5 195, can only modify the order, the Principal. Any type of illegal or irregular conduct is committed by the Operator or any such order against the Principal Operator's order by the Deputy Collector of Customs, without any jurisdiction, illegal or unlawful authority, Without importer's rights

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• Ch. MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE, ADVOCATE v. CANTONMENT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHUNIAN, DISTRICT KASUR 2009 PLD 240
• AUTOCRAFT through Proprietor v. DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS 2009 PTD 244
• Malik ZULFIQAR v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Communication Islamabad 2009 MLD 244
• PUNJAB ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ORGANIZATION (REGISTERED) through Vice-President v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Irrigation and Power, Lahore 2009 PLD 245
• MANZAR LATIF MIAN v. Ms. MASARRAT MISBAH 2009 CLD 247
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. State 2009 PCrLJ 251
• GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD KHAN 2009 YLR 251
• Malik BASHIR AHMAD v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through D.C.O., Khushab 2009 MLD 252

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

when you need a advocate from Jhudo lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes