Find a Lawyer

IBRAHIM FIBRES\' LIMITED THROUGH SECRETARY versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (AUDIT), LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, LAHORE

Article 146 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application, despite the approval of the immunity granted by the Commissioner, the Assisi moved the application for extension of the stay order but the department was pending. , The application was affecting rehabilitation. If such a request is pending, if the request in question is pending, the Department will not affect the recovery until the time is decided in the application for an extension or appeal. ? The High Court directed the Commissioner (Appeal) to decide the appeal as soon as possible. Order accordingly within the next two months \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• MUHAMMAD JAHANGIR v. SHAHEEN BIBI 2009 YLR 1991
• JAFARI & CO. through Muhammad Javed v. TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION (T.M.O.), SHEIKHUPURA 2009 YLR 1994
• LIAQAT alias SAAIN v. State 2009 YLR 1999
• MERAJ DIN v. COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SALES TAX (APPEALS), LAHORE 2009 PTD 2004
• LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director-General, L.D.A., Lahore v. MUKHTAR AHMED 2009 YLR 2013
• KHIZAR HAYAT v. State 2009 YLR 2016
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. State 2009 YLR 2044
• Syed ZAKIR HUSSAIN SHAH v. PUNJAB COOPERATIVE BOARD FOR LIQUIDATION (PCBL), LAHORE 2009 YLR 2046

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Zhob lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes