In appeal against the rejection of the OVI, R17 and Section 100 amendment request, the trial court appealed to the plaintiff to amend the plaintiff under OVI, R17, CPC, with the trial court appealing to Modi. Also refused treatment. In the review petition and the plaintiff filed an appeal against the revocation request, the valid appeal was not sustained as no appeal was granted against the rejection of the revision request in the CPC, but the lawyer for the plaintiff on the merit also changed the appeal. Could not agree to give the plaintiff a writ of reasonable citation, because the subject matter of the most recent amendment request was already decided and the trial amendment hearing was allowed by the trial court as requested in the previous petition. The Plaintiff's request for a plaintiff may be amended, but for the plaintiff the plaintiff must first The order was agreed before the Pelot Court and the order was set aside. The subject was not able, on the basis of well-known principle, that no one could be defeated twice for the purpose which was abolished and it was finalized.
