ALI MUHAMMAD versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR 1ST GRADE/RECOVERY MAGISTRATE, GILGIT
Sections 86, 87 and 114 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Sections 86, 87 and 114 of the Special Relief Act (Sec. 1877), Declaration and Order for the Recovery of Government Obligations for the Disciplinary Claimant, who was a Government Contractor Was responsible for Receiving the case money, the Deputy Commissioner directed the Assistant Collector (Recovery) to recover the money from it as the pending trial of the land revenue filed by the plaintiff by the plaintiff and the appellate court decided the case. Was maintained. JUDICIAL JURISDICTION The following two courts failed to determine the substantive and substantive issues involved in the case, and showed seriousness about the permanent abandonment of the matters to be dealt with, the procedure adopted and its application. Is the legal sanction behind the proceedings taken under. Authorities to recover alleged liabilities from the plaintiff; and was the Deputy Commissioner able to instruct the Assistant Commissioner (Recovery) to recover the alleged liability from the plaintiff, such as the provisions of section 3 of the Recovery Ordinance, 1962? Is an amount owed by the government to the receivables. There were arrears of land revenue from the defaulters, but after receipt of the declarations due by the government notification, it could be received as arrears of land revenue while none other than the provincial government. The officer or authority was unable to declare any government. The dues are equal to the residual recovery of the land revenue, in the present case the deputy commissioner, who directed the assistant collector, is nowhere in the relevant law.
