The suit for termination of cases for Sections 6 and 13 on the basis that the plaintiff is entitled to more than the right to be a shareholder in the litigation property is granted by the trial court. I went to appeal. With a delayed petition because the appeal was dismissed after a fixed period of time, ie one year and six months. The appeal was dismissed by the appellate court on the basis of the limitation, the affirmative suit was repeatedly transferred from one court to another. Lace appeared in front of the court, the presiding officer was exchanged and the case was adjourned as a note reader as his defense was terminated when no defendant appeared. Ali never requested a postponement and an order. The trial court's notice that the notice was given to the respondent under the provisions of O XVII, R 3, CPC was unverified because read the note on the postponement date. Also, the defendant was not present when the date `note reader on Was postponed, no provisions of the CPC could be taken or any previous action was taken, the trial court's order was held without any basis and no jurisdiction. Was. As a hindrance to settling the invalid order, the appellate court also did not properly exercise this jurisdiction by filing an appeal through the defendant, while not allowing the appeal to be filed when any order in the latter part of the party. The document was approved and without notice, the boundary conditions will not go its way.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
