Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHAIR KHAN versus STATE


The section,, & and (c) the testimony of evidence did not present any direct or circumstantial evidence The accused was not charged with the alleged recovery of drug paraphernalia linked to the commission of the crime directly to the accused. The accused was not arrested for physical and physical possession. The police allegedly recovered the contents of contraband chars found in statements of the prosecution witnesses who contradicted the arrest and drug charges. Extremely skeptical in the recovery, the trial court did not, in its original context, have appreciated the evidence of the prosecution. The contentious verdict of Vert's conviction was not in accordance with the provisions of Section 676767, the CCP prosecution case was full of doubts, which would enable the accused to acquit the accused and exclude the accused. The accused was acquitted. In this case, he was charged and set free.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Patoki lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.