Section 2 (c) (I), Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Request for Discharge Application for Landlord and Tenant Pending Expulsion, an objector requested in the petition that it has a share , Was an essential party, and should be enforced as it was stated at the hearing of the pending proceedings between the parties that the application was dismissed by the Controller of Rent and his appeal before the Appellate Authority was also unsuccessful. ? The constitutional petition, however, never challenged that the applicant, under Article 199 of the Constitution's constitution, was not the same applicant who rejected the facts of the case, stating that the defendant was a resident, no. There was no order because the High Court had specifically directed the mutual consent of his lawyer. The parties, who control the rent, will decide a preliminary matter and, after giving opportunity to the parties to the evidence, decide the matter. Such an order was still intact and the rent controller would decide the matter from time to time in the constitutional belt. N was rejected in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
