Section 497 (2) Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Section 9 Bail, Further Investigation Grant The defendant was neither the owner of the vehicle used to transport the narcotics nor his The driver was and he was just traveling in it being the driver of a private car, wanting to be aware of the contents of such car, without the knowledge or physical possession of the car, the contents of the vehicle's secret caves. The driver of the transport vehicle was not responsible. Any material available to a casual passenger traveling with a driver cannot be considered a secret of drug trafficking offense, unless relevant to the vehicle or the driver or the recovered drug. Is. The owner of the vehicle was proven and traveling on it would certainly be equally responsible with his driver as he was a BI NG owner who was thought to have knowledge of the carriage holes or Only the driver is likely to use the carrier, while the owner may be the original culprit found on the front seat of the vehicle. Blind eyes should be held liable for anything in the car's secret caves, unless it is established that he was the owner of the vehicle or the drug car belonging to the suspect. It can be held liable, if there is a link between the accused or the owner, which was not investigated by the investigating officer, then the matter is considered to be one of the more inadequate material, whereby the original accused The accused could not be established, but it was considered to release the accused on bail
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
