Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 bail, the grant of further investigation, the rival parties filed two separate FIs against each other as the cases of the same transaction are known. Proceedings were underway with the investigating officer recording statements of about five to five people as witnesses to the incident, but during the preliminary investigation, the investigating officer joined with each other to be a part of the incident. Connected, however, they all took an oath that they had not seen the incident allegedly and that they had The accused did not make any statement against the site plan and contradicted the allegations made in the FIR, considering all the facts and circumstances present in the case and without mentioning its merits. In detail, it will be seen in the trial, indeed at what happened there. In such a situation, who initiated the fight and who acted in self-defense, the general rule was to guarantee a determination of who committed the wrongdoing and aggression, pending further investigation of the matter, The suspects were released on bail, under conditions
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
