Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Guarantee, grant grant Esha Vela \, identification of the assailants, specific character with one of them at the time of further investigation. There were several distances at which the Inquiry Officer completely denied the prosecutor's story described in the FIR, and through eyewitnesses, two prosecution witnesses told different stories about the incident. He said that after the artificial break in the evening, when he learned that his uncle's dry grass had caught fire, he went to extinguish the fire and on his return visit, the accused Investigation Officer examined them. Fired on. To prove the alleged eyewitness testimony of the incident, any evidence of jelly, all the facts and circumstances in the case suggested that no reasonable basis, of course, was linking the accused to the crime. And that the prosecution's case is open for further investigation, the accused deserves bail privilege, the accused was admitted to bail, under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
